Ask / Submit

Revision history [back]

click to hide/show revision 1
initial version

posted 2014-11-28 05:20:00 +0300

I don't like any stretch goals which involve paying patent protection money to MS. It's very not nice to take crowdfunded money in that direction. If Jolla want better filesystem support, let them invest into developing F2FS, that should be a stretch goal.

And split screen? I'd rather see browser taken care of. It's quite a long time since initial release and UI still doesn't support Mozilla Sync and mobile Firefox add-ons.

I don't like any stretch goals which involve paying patent protection money to MS. It's very not nice to take crowdfunded money in that direction. If Jolla want better filesystem support, let them invest into developing F2FS, that should be a stretch goal.

And split screen? I'd rather see browser taken care of. It's quite a long time since initial release and UI still doesn't support Mozilla Sync and mobile Firefox add-ons.

And in general, I think there should be some transparency about patent situation in Jolla. Does Jolla already pay for anything? Did anyone threaten them? Since community plans to support Jolla, it should be clear how that money are used.

I don't like any stretch goals which involve paying patent protection money to MS. It's very not nice to take crowdfunded money in that direction. If Jolla want better filesystem support, let them invest into developing F2FS, that should be a stretch goal.

And split screen? I'd rather see browser taken care of. It's quite a long time since initial release and UI still doesn't support Mozilla Sync and mobile Firefox add-ons.

And in general, I think there should be some transparency about patent situation in Jolla. Does Jolla already pay for anything? (I guess they should be paying to MPEG-LA for H.264 at least). Did anyone threaten them? Since community plans to support Jolla, it should be clear how that money are used.

I don't like any stretch goals which involve paying patent protection money to MS. It's very not nice to take crowdfunded money in that direction. If Jolla want better filesystem support, let them invest into developing F2FS, that should be a stretch goal.

And split screen? I'd rather see browser taken care of. It's quite a long time since initial release and UI still doesn't support Mozilla Sync and mobile Firefox add-ons.

And in general, I think there should be some transparency about patent situation in Jolla. Does Jolla already pay for anything? (I guess they should be paying to MPEG-LA for H.264 at least). Did anyone threaten them? Since community plans to support Jolla, it should be clear how that money are used.

And split screen? I'd rather see browser taken care of. It's quite a long time since initial release and UI still doesn't support Mozilla Sync and mobile Firefox add-ons.