Sfos support connections to asteroidos too?
Maybe it is a stupid question, but at last aimed to have a clear answer... Do someone knows if Sfos may support the connection to asteroidos ?
We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
Maybe it is a stupid question, but at last aimed to have a clear answer... Do someone knows if Sfos may support the connection to asteroidos ?
I would read Your question regarding connection to smartwatches in general. Connection between smart devices usually involves Bluetooth LE or smart. Although Jolla (as SFOS device) supports Bluetooth 4.0 it does not (offically) support Bluetooth LE or smart. see topics like: https://together.jolla.com/question/8589/proper-bluetooth-le-support/
@Macilaci457 yes at first it should support this interface. But each service interfaces (calendar, notification or each things like sms) should be at last reached. I have no idea on who works bluetooth. Same frame format on bluetooth for the applewatch or android watch doesn't make the same event or appearance on each watch...
cemoi71 ( 2016-04-21 17:15:37 +0200 )editOn today's Jolla MWC presentation there is a mention of a Sailfish OS for smartwatches:
https://twitter.com/JulianChokkattu/status/836171876011507712
Don't know if it's asteroid based
This thread is public, all members of Together.Jolla.Com can read this page.
Asked: 2016-04-21 14:16:02 +0200
Seen: 701 times
Last updated: Feb 27 '17
Enable more refined locale Settings that are respected by system and 3rd-party apps
Suggestion: Switch to disable swiping in Android apps. [duplicate]
Sailfish or Android support development [answered]
Where to start with developing sailfish app? [answered]
some ideas for next sailfish update [subjective]
Clarification of open-source policy [answered]
Could sailfish/apps updates be distributed using bittorrent ? [answered]
Full connection of sfos to asteroidos? What exactly do you mean, this is very imprecise. It does "fully connections" with ssh, f.e., so what do you mean?
Moo-Crumpus ( 2016-04-21 16:35:50 +0200 )edit@Moo-Crumpus no no, how it is written was not meant with this interpretation of "full connection". It is an adverb. But after your reaction and thinking again, "fully" may be too much in the sentence.
cemoi71 ( 2016-04-21 17:09:15 +0200 )editEither it is supported, or not... Not completely or fully, would be meant that it is still under development...
which protocol must be used, was not expected on the thread. They are already defined and used.
... updated
cemoi71 ( 2016-04-21 17:10:11 +0200 )edit