Software development is a bit slow for Sailfish OS [not a question]

asked 2016-08-20 19:36:53 +0300

partha9940 gravatar image

updated 2016-08-22 10:53:51 +0300

jiit gravatar image

For Sailfish to afloat and Sail along the development of OS should be a bit faster. There should be clear roadmap for the next issue of software and some critical points need to be addressed based upon user feedback. More Games should be included in the app section to make the platform lucrative. Games should be at par with the popular android games that performs better on SF OS with less resources. Next major release should have a probable time line and goals mentioned.What others say..

edit retag flag offensive reopen delete

The question has been closed for the following reason "not a real question" by nthn
close date 2016-08-20 21:59:31.308354

Comments

3

someone should create said games though...

g7 ( 2016-08-20 19:56:35 +0300 )edit
2

Agree. I have no idea when will next version available. I do not play on my phone. But i need apps like android has. Not 19815983278723 gillion, Let it be 10 000 But USEFUL apps

AnonUser10082 ( 2016-08-20 21:46:21 +0300 )edit
2

So far this hasn't been updated for 2016, but it used to exist anyway: https://sailfishos.org/developmentroadmap/

Also this isn't really a question and all points have been brought up numerous times before which you could have easily found by searching.

nthn ( 2016-08-20 21:58:23 +0300 )edit
4

The sad thing is that all the points that "have been brought up numerous times before" are still valid now. That makes the subject of this thread more relevant with every passing day. Three years is a long time, the "young OS" excuse stopped being valid a long time ago.

pichlo ( 2016-08-20 23:01:17 +0300 )edit
4

Of course, but mentioning the shortcomings again and again won't make them come faster. Priorities may be wrong, but just how fast do you expect development of an entire operating system to be from a company which has what, fifty employees total?

Saying nothing of the rather vague "some critical points need to be addressed based upon user feedback".

nthn ( 2016-08-20 23:04:13 +0300 )edit