Ask / Submit

ConnMan does not support setting up anonymous or outer EAP identity for WiFi WPA Enterprise [released]

asked 2014-01-16 10:04:15 +0200

updated 2014-02-13 00:04:45 +0200

In addition to that ConnMan does not support certificate detail validation ConnMan also lacks the configuration settings for setting inner and outer EAP identity separately.

This means that the user is not able to set the outer identity in WiFi roaming networks to be for example to protect user's true inner identity.

This also means that if organisation's authentication server is configured to accept only username without realm (e.g. user instead of, the user cannot configure ConnMan properly for roaming networks. This is because ConnMan seems to copy the inner identity to outer without possibility to add realm for WiFi roaming routing.

edit retag flag offensive reopen delete

The question has been closed for the following reason "released in a software update" by nthn
close date 2017-03-06 13:59:58.632295

2 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted

answered 2015-08-27 15:20:04 +0200

jgke gravatar image

This is supposedly fixed in upstream ConnMan, in commit 1d5429.

edit flag offensive delete publish link more


hopefully this filters through soon to sailfish.

GD ( 2015-08-27 16:49:13 +0200 )edit

Can't tell when.. but it is included in

tigeli ( 2015-08-29 00:04:42 +0200 )edit

If all goes well this is included in the update after the update after 1.1.9.x.

tigeli ( 2015-09-10 23:42:00 +0200 )edit

so if I want to use this feature I will finally have to say goodbye to SfOS 1 :(

tad ( 2015-11-06 10:41:42 +0200 )edit

answered 2014-01-16 10:06:37 +0200

The solution is of course to ConnMan or Jolla to add configuration of inner and outer EAP identity to ConnMan. There are of course some other solutions also documented here.

edit flag offensive delete publish link more



it seemed the patched chromium connman has it and alot more

chemist ( 2014-01-16 13:52:18 +0200 )edit

@chemist good tip

Karri Huhtanen ( 2014-01-16 14:24:55 +0200 )edit

@chemist getting their enhancements to upstream would be even better...

tad ( 2015-06-03 14:12:44 +0200 )edit

Question tools



Asked: 2014-01-16 10:04:15 +0200

Seen: 1,105 times

Last updated: Aug 27 '15