Ask / Submit
4

Introducing new native Sailfish apps here at Together [duplicate]

asked 2014-01-19 23:46:06 +0300

simo gravatar image

updated 2014-07-25 13:20:20 +0300

jiit gravatar image

To gain even better value for users and app developers in our community portal, it would be nice to get all the store apps introduced here under a same tag. I'm asking: If there is a nice way to make this happen, would you like to see the apps here (among all the other thing we do already)?

Edit: the above is essentially copied from.here: https://together.jolla.com/question/7979/identify-applications-with-unique-tag-on-store-release-to-support-eg-application-homepages-in-together/

and from this Answer (in regards of making Together a web-version of Store): https://together.jolla.com/question/2721/jolla-application-store-web-version/#post-id-3333

edit retag flag offensive reopen delete

The question has been closed for the following reason "duplicate question" by foss4ever
close date 2014-01-20 10:33:46.422789

Comments

1

This would be good and these app could be also reviewed by users too. Developers would get the important feedback on their work and get new ideas for improvements on updates.

TimTTK ( 2014-01-20 00:10:41 +0300 )edit

@jjaone the idea I first posted as an answer to your question was declared redundant by yourself. After I moved it under its own topic (because I also felt it was redundant), you now see it as a duplicate and close it? Please explain your behaviour a bit - IMO, our questions remain as related, not duplicate. However, I leave the decision to you to keep this closed or reopen it.

simo ( 2014-01-20 11:56:45 +0300 )edit

No, your tagging system is different than proposed in original (and IMO much more complex, and would only duplicate the information in the single tag prefixes, thus 'redundant' in effect but needing two tags to do it). It was your decision to remove it from that question, not mine. Now this (new) question description is essentially duplicating the idea and suggestion of the question and answer linked in the description (the proposal of introdcuing store apps to Together appropriatly tagged). Of course, it would have been and still is much simpler to continue this discussion in the original question and not to fork another.

foss4ever ( 2014-01-20 12:12:42 +0300 )edit

Oh, I see you've edited the title + the question there to include the introduction (updated 3 hour ago?) After that this really looks like a duplicate, unlike before, but it could also be seen that now your question duplicates this as well :D. Let's just forget it and work this out... I take it that after you're edit we are now very close to the same subject, so should I, in your opinion, move the original answer back there, and maybe @mgbler might move/edit his answer too? I wouldn't like to mix this soup any more.

simo ( 2014-01-20 12:33:08 +0300 )edit

1 Answer

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
2

answered 2014-01-20 01:05:05 +0300

mgbler gravatar image

Like the idea to have a central place of feedback but i'm not sure how that scales if there are, let's say, several thousand apps. Perhaps it is better to post feedback directly on the website of the specific app, i.e. on openrepos or jolla harbour (which then should be accessible through any browser, because writing and followin long post on smartphones isn't convenient)

edit flag offensive delete publish link more

Comments

@simo: "he could make himself the last editor and then unmark the wiki (confirmation needed for this to work)." As it is currently: This does not work. Once a wiki always a wiki.

jgr ( 2014-01-20 01:15:15 +0300 )edit

@jgr thanks, edited

simo ( 2014-01-20 03:38:57 +0300 )edit

@mgbier I don't see the scaling as a problem, as we can always use tag filtering + sorting options.

simo ( 2014-01-20 09:57:02 +0300 )edit

Stats

Asked: 2014-01-19 23:46:06 +0300

Seen: 258 times

Last updated: Jan 20 '14