answered
2015-09-18 20:30:14 +0200
I just can't say what exasperates me most: delays, "tomorrows", or total Jolla silence when next promised "tomorrow", "soon", "early September" (you can name more) is missed. If there is some problem, why not to say you have it before we get nervous? Do Jolla really think it's better to try to keep silence as long as possible until the next wave of dissatisfaction rises and then throw us some more promises? Is that the way "people powered" things should be done?
What I can say now, when (hopefully not "if") my tablet arrives, I would not be as much happy, as I would be in May. Even if the screen was not so perfect.
Things does not look so bright now, as they used to be 10 month back… If I had any idea of how long we would have to wait and how small communication we would get from Jolla, I would never order the tablet. Because I didn't need it so much, but just wanted to support the company I liked.
I'm sorry for been non-constructive and pessimistic, but I am absolutely sure, this lack of communication is not because of Jolla is a small company and they don't have enough human resources to post regulary some update. It's just an attitude to all of us here — not from all of Jolla sailors but from some (may be) big boss(-es) in response for PR. He/she/they just don't think there's something to share with us. Looks really sad and disappointing.
Come on, relax a little ;)
gehowa ( 2015-09-11 23:45:04 +0200 )editThe hardware is ready. The software isn't I guess.
leszek ( 2015-09-12 00:32:44 +0200 )editEr, no, the opposite is true. The software is ready, and has been for quite some time now. There are demo tablets running around all over the place, and several reviews have already been written using those tablets.
However, a number of problems have continued to hamper the hardware side, from the display issues early this year to the more recent factory scheduling and logistics issues. Once they can start successfully producing the tablets in volume, shipping will commence.
Copernicus ( 2015-09-12 01:09:52 +0200 )editI know about the hardware issues though I think they are pretty much now ouf of the way. I still have doubts about the software.
Will split screen make it into 2.0, because it was announced to release around this time? Will the little quirks with the new eventsview and android support we experience on the phone also happen on the tablet? What about software? We are still not allowed to upload x86 versions of our apps to harbour because the SDK isn't ready yet. So the store will be almost completely empty on arrival of the tablet? I also don't see tablet versions on openrepos. So basically if I would review the tablet based on the native apps which are pretty much non existent I cannot be amazed and as reviewer I can only criticize that. OK there is Android Support but if it isn't top notch and you have bugs like notifications not producing sounds or not shown at all nobody would be amazed by that aswell.
In the end the question remains will the tablet and especially the OS amaze the reviewers and users? Or will it be another 'meh' review? Or will it be a 'has potential but needs improvement' review? Last time I remembered this was exactly that what most Jolla Phone reviewers said. There comes the time that one day Jolla and SailfishOS needs more than such reviews. So that new users and developers will be interested in SailfishOS and start using it. Remember this Tablet is a flagship device for the SailfishOS Platform so it needs that kind of quality that attracts people to it.
leszek ( 2015-09-12 01:40:00 +0200 )editWell, then, I suppose you _don't_ want them to release the tablet just yet, if you want to wait until the software is polished and "amazing". :)
A few items:
tl;dr: Sailfish is fine as it is. And it will improve over time! There should be nothing software-related to delay the tablet at this point.
Copernicus ( 2015-09-12 02:07:58 +0200 )edit