We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2015-09-11 22:30:02 +0200 |
Not that I think they all are left unfixed, but seeing that none of them has been granted a "Tracked by Jolla" flag, seems somewhat odd. I've understood that the Early Adopters are doing an important job for us all reporting new bugs here in advance - and that Jolla responds into those reports they find important.
My question is: Is this still valid?
Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes (link to official announcement)
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
2 | No.2 Revision |
Not that I think they all are left unfixed, but seeing that none of them has been granted a "Tracked by Jolla" flag, seems somewhat odd. I've understood that the Early Adopters are doing an important job for us all reporting new bugs here in advance - and that Jolla responds into those reports they find important.
My question is: Is this still valid?
Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes (link to official announcement)
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
edit: Just to make it clear why I wanted to ask this: On 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of about 70 questions tagged as bug reports, of which 52 were left unanswered. It seems now that the Early Adopters are being quite active and helpful, while Jolla isn't delivering their "part of the deal" (quoted above). In a long run, this might affect on the Early Adopters willing to post the reports, leaving some of them frustrated if found the reporting does not return what's expected
3 | No.3 Revision |
Not that I think they all are left unfixed, but seeing that none of them has been granted a "Tracked by Jolla" flag, seems somewhat odd. I've understood that the Early Adopters are doing an important job edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for us all reporting new bugs here in advance - and that Jolla responds into those reports they find important.clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
Early"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the releasenotesnotes"
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
edit: Just to To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: On I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of about 70 questions tagged as several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug reports, of which report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | Version | reported | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | to Known Issues | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75 | 2 | 21 | 52were left unanswered. It seems now| 3 | 1 | 0 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5 | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | No version tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | - | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | - | +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+
Please note that the Early Adopters are being quite active and helpful, while Jolla isn't delivering their "part part of the deal" (quoted above). In a long run, questions calculated might include more than one version tag, so this might affect on the is not an exact table:
1.1.9.28 Early Adopters willing to post the reports, leaving some of them frustrated if found the reporting does not return what's expectedAccess: bugs reported so far
4 | No.4 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------++-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | Version| reported | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release |toKnown Issues |+----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------++-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | 1.1.9.x| 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | 1.1.7.x| 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | 1.1.6.x| 75 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | 1.1.4.x| 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | 1.1.2.x| 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | SUM (EA)| 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | Noversion tagv-tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | -| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+ | SUM (all)| 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | -| +----------------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+-----------------+| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+
Please note that part of the questions calculated might include more than one version tag, so this is not an exact table:
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
5 | No.5 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------++-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | Version |reportedReports | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | KnownIssues | +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+Iss. | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36| 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86| 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75| 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86| 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46| 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329| 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | No v-tag | 2608| 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | -| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937| 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | -| +-----------+----------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+--------------+| +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+
Please note that part of the questions calculated might include more than one version tag, so this is not an exact table:
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
6 | No.6 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | Version | Reports | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | Known Iss. | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | No v-tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+
Please note that Last column "Known Iss." should be read as "Added to Known Issues on the release notes". Also note: part of the questions calculated might include more than one version tag, so this is the values are not an exact table:exact.
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
7 | No.7 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | Version | Reports | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | Known Iss. | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | No v-tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+
Notes on the table:
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
8 | No.8 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | Version | Reports | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | Known Iss. | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | No v-tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+
Notes on the table:
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far
9 | No.9 Revision |
edit: Rephrased my question and added some statistics for clearance
My question is: Is this quote still valid?
"Early access releases should be considered "stable". Issues found during that period will either be fixed, or added to "known issues" on the release notes"
To make it clear why I wanted to ask this: I noticed that on 1.1.7 Early Access, only one issue was added to the Known Issues on the release notes, out of several bugs reported, few of them having also some importance. Adding here also some statistics of bug report activity, taken on September 12th 2015.
+-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | Version | Reports | Closed | Answered | Open | Tracked | In release | Known Iss. | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.9.x | 36 | 1 | 4 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.7.x | 86 | 2 | 27 | 57 | 5 | 3 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.6.x | 75 | 2 | 21 | 52 | 3 | 1 | 0 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.4.x | 86 | 5 | 20 | 61 | 4 | 2 | 1 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | 1.1.2.x | 46 | 1 | 10 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 3 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (EA) | 329 | 11 | 82 | 236 | 16 | 6 | 5 | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | No v-tag | 2608 | 302 | 743 | 1563 | 25 | 5 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+ | SUM (all) | 2937 | 313 | 825 | 1799 | 41 | 11 | - | +-----------+---------+--------+----------+------+---------+------------+------------+
Notes on the table:
1.1.9.28 Early Access: bugs reported so far