Revision history [back]

After a few days with SFOS 1.1.98 I tend to more and more like it. Some things are different, some unusual, many better but some also worse. Regarding the latter, I think the far worst are the new Cover-Buttons which are tiny, easily missed but also often unintentionally triggered. But it wasn't SailfishOS if there wasn't a patch for this on OpenRepos - the integration of pully menus in the cover tiles: https://openrepos.net/content/nodevel/patch-pulldown-covers Having this patch installed, the Jolla feels far more useable, no accidental triggering of cover actions but also easy selection. However, it's a patch and it doesn't integrate in the GUI as good as if it were genuine, in terms that it needs an initial trigger to become active and swiping down to the apps screen doesn't work when hitting a cover. If Jolla would integrate this UI change properly these issues could surely be resolved. Please, Jolla, make it genuine!! :)

After a few days with SFOS 1.1.98 1.1.9.28 I tend to more and more like it. Some things are different, some unusual, many better but some also worse. Regarding the latter, I think the far worst are the new Cover-Buttons which are tiny, easily missed but also often unintentionally triggered. But it wasn't SailfishOS if there wasn't a patch for this on OpenRepos - the integration of pully menus in the cover tiles: https://openrepos.net/content/nodevel/patch-pulldown-covers Having this patch installed, the Jolla feels far more useable, no accidental triggering of cover actions but also easy selection. However, it's a patch and it doesn't integrate in the GUI as good as if it were genuine, in terms that it needs an initial trigger to become active and swiping down to the apps screen doesn't work when hitting a cover. If Jolla would integrate this UI change properly these issues could surely be resolved. Please, Jolla, make it genuine!! :)