We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2015-11-05 14:05:03 +0200 |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
2 | No.2 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
3 | No.3 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
4 | No.4 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you are agree!
5 | No.5 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you are agree!
6 | No.6 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
7 | No.7 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
8 | No.8 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
Edit: @malatu Patches @ Open Repos
9 | No.9 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
Edit: @malatu @mlatu Patches @ Open Repos
10 | No.10 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate foreinsorces forein sorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
Edit: @mlatu Here can you find some one: Patches @ available at Open Repos
11 | No.11 Revision |
I like SailfishOS as an open alternative mobile OS. I join since the beginning of N900, had a N9 too, one of the first one and early adopter. I´m free to give my feedback and improvement suggestions at all.
But since UI 2, there are some changings that i don´t like. (Button style, Pully style and behavier, removing swipe to lock, etc...) I guess i´m not the only one.
Ok, the developer may think "Its better, easier, obsolete, more modern or something". Could be, but not in all cases!
You can see the requests for change a lot of things. These changes are already implemented by patches from the community. There is not a lot of time to integrate for you to make a really greate experience for all users.
Not everybody is using patches causing risks, activate forein sorces or going to the Warehouse. But they want the option to change the UI as the want.
My appeal use the force and integrate the patches as option. Give the power to the users!
edit: It´s sad that great idears like Low Power Mode (LPM) are not comming to all as option, this features are more than eastereggs.
Pls vote up if you agree!
Edit: @mlatu Here can you find some one: Patches available at Open Repos
edit: Update to 2.0.1.7 nothing changed - it is annoying to disable all patches before updating, please integrate it on 2.0.2.x