Revision history [back]

There has been much discussion about how Jolla could proceed with the tabled campaign recently. If I understand correctly Jolla's priority is to deliver the tablets even in their critical financial situation.

But let's think about that. We, the community who paid for the campaign, should be heared if that should be really our main goal.

Of cause we would like to get the tablets we paid for. But for some of us a tablet without further manufacturer support might be of little value, just some more gadget lying around. A financially healthy Jolla company that ensures further Sailfish development and cares for adapting the OS to new hardware could be much more valuable.

If Jolla could survive only when some or all campaign contributors resign "their" tablets, that should be offered as alternative to the community. Jolla should know how many contributors would prefer the tablet, and how many would prefer further support. Jolla should execute a survey in order to get these numbers.

Of cause this question is completely void in two cases: when either the Jolla ship would sink anyway, or Jolla's financial situation would suddenly relax.

There has been much discussion about how Jolla could proceed with the tabled campaign recently. If I understand correctly Jolla's priority is to deliver the tablets even in their critical financial situation.

But let's think about that. We, the community who paid for the campaign, should be heared if that should be really our main goal.

Of cause we would like to get the tablets we paid for. But for some of us a tablet without further manufacturer support might be of little value, just some more gadget lying around. A financially healthy Jolla company that ensures further Sailfish development and cares for adapting the OS to new hardware could be much more valuable.

If Jolla could survive only when some or all campaign contributors resign "their" tablets, that should be offered as alternative to the community. Jolla should know how many contributors would prefer the tablet, and how many would prefer further support. Jolla should execute a survey in order to get these numbers.

Of cause this question is completely void in two cases: when either the Jolla ship would sink anyway, or Jolla's financial situation would suddenly relax.

There has been much discussion about how Jolla could proceed with the tabled tablet campaign recently. If I understand correctly Jolla's priority is to deliver the tablets even in their critical financial situation.

But let's think about that. We, the community who paid for the campaign, should be heared heard if that should be really our main goal.

Of cause course we would like to get the tablets we paid for. But for some of us a tablet without further manufacturer support might be of little value, just some more gadget lying around. A financially healthy Jolla company that ensures further Sailfish development and cares for adapting the OS to new hardware could be much more valuable.

If Jolla could survive only when some or all campaign contributors resign "their" tablets, that should be offered as alternative to the community. Jolla should know how many contributors would prefer the tablet, and how many would prefer further support. Jolla should execute a survey in order to get these numbers.

Of cause course this question is completely void in two cases: when either the Jolla ship would sink anyway, or Jolla's financial situation would suddenly relax.