Revision history [back]

It should not be acceptable to suggest shell workarounds! The longer these workarounds exist the problems will not get addressed. Even if you know how to do it with shell, say "No it is a bug and does not work, hopefully will get addressed in next update". Then downvote anybody who suggests shell workaround!

It should not be acceptable to suggest third party programs for industry standard functionality. It increase attack surface, waste resources and problems will not get addressed! If somebody suggest third party program downvote him!

Let's do this! Thanks!

It should not be acceptable to suggest shell workarounds! The longer these workarounds exist the problems will not get addressed. Even if you know how to do it with shell, say "No it is a bug and does not work, hopefully will get addressed in next update". Then downvote anybody who suggests shell workaround!

It should not be acceptable to suggest third party programs for industry standard functionality. It increase attack surface, waste resources and problems will not get addressed! If somebody suggest third party program downvote him!

Let's do this! Thanks!

It should not be acceptable to suggest shell workarounds! The longer these workarounds exist the problems will not get addressed. Even if you know how to do it with shell, say "No it is a bug and does not work, hopefully will get addressed in next update". Then downvote anybody who suggests shell workaround!

It should not be acceptable to suggest third party programs for industry standard functionality. It increase attack surface, waste resources and problems will not get addressed! If somebody suggest third party program downvote him!

Let's do this! Thanks!

EDIT: In hindsight this idea may be too abrasive and disruptive. I don't think is wholly invalid, some fix needed. Remember to upvote the bugs at least! Maybe refrain from upvoting hax solutions( so do not downvote either. leave them be.)? I fix this for my jollailija thread if possible.