We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2016-06-08 12:48:46 +0200 |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
2 | No.2 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki http://flatpak.org/
3 | No.3 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
4 | No.4 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
5 | retagged |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
6 | retagged |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/