Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
| 2 | No.2 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki http://flatpak.org/
| 3 | No.3 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
| 4 | No.4 Revision |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
| 5 | retagged |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/
| 6 | retagged |
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki
http://flatpak.org/