Revision history [back]

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)
2. pro: security
3. contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)
4. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)
5. pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!
6. contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)

2. pro: security

3. contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)

4. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)

5. pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!

6. contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)

2. pro: security

3. contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)

4. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)

5. pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!

6. contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)

   lock)
   • pro: security

   • pro: security

   • contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)

2. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)

(domain.tld/example)

• pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!

• contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)
   • pro: security
   • contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)
2. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)
   • pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!
   • contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)
   • pro: security
   • contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)
2. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)
   • pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!
   • contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

in the standard brwoser the url is not shown correctly. it only shows: domain.tld

whats missing are:

1. protocol (http/https) to know if the connection is secure (could be replaced by a symbol - i.e. a lock)
   • pro: security
   • contra: in portrait mode the text (https) could shift the domain name out of view (less so if lock icon is used)
2. the rest of the url (domain.tld/example)
   • pro: being able to navigate on a site!!!!!!!
   • contra: NONE!!!!

this is a serious anti-feature and therefore a bug (especially point 2 - since there is no reason to cut it off)

edit: stupid anti-feature still remains in SFOSv2.0.2.51