We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2019-04-02 14:44:15 +0200 |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicate app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
2 | No.2 Revision |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicate dedicated app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
3 | No.3 Revision |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicated app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
PS: And yes, I know it's basically what Jolla have tried with Telepathy but I don't mean trying to revive a dead horse.
4 | No.4 Revision |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicated app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
Please leave a vote should you be interested in a Multi Protocol Chat app for SFOS.
PS: And yes, I know it's basically what Jolla have tried with Telepathy but I don't mean trying to revive a dead horse.
5 | No.5 Revision |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicated app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
Please leave a vote should you be interested in a Multi Protocol Chat app for SFOS.
PS: And yes, I know it's basically what Jolla have tried with Telepathy but I don't mean trying to revive a dead horse.years ago.
6 | No.6 Revision |
I have been brooding over this idea for quite a while now and I'm still not sure if it's just me that thinks having a
Multi Protocol Chat Client
supplementing the existing chat applications on Saifish would be a good idea.
After all, the very essence of any of these chat applications is to exchange chat messages, send/receive photos, arbitrary files and sometimes also voice messages or real-time voice/video streams.
I don't really see anything that would require every single protocol to have a dedicated app on SFOS. This could furthermore even free developers from having to reinvent the (UI) wheel over and over again every time a new protocol comes around.
e.g. I already have a few protocol daemons here which I mostly use from the command line:
All it would take to make them work on SFOS would be to create a common meta-protocol to tie together the actual protocol bits and the UI part (e.g. simple JSON sent back and forth over stdin) and to wrap a nice GUI around all of this.
But before I start wasting my time developing something no one really ever asked for I would like to make sure there is some actual demand for such an extravagance.
Please leave a vote should you be interested in a Multi Protocol Chat app for SFOS.
PS: And yes, I know it's basically what Jolla have tried with Telepathy years ago.ago but, in contrast to this, this project is meant to be a stand alone app.