We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2020-06-04 19:34:09 +0200 |
The Calculator displays accurately numbers up to 100,000,000, anything above that is displayed in the exponential notation (e.g., 100,000,001 results in 1x10^8).
While further calculations are accurate, there is no option to expand the bigger number, and a copy to clipboard also copies the exponential notation.
I am not sure whether this is intended, a bug or perhaps there's a missing feature to allow the user to expand that number, so I'll let Jolla tag/comment accordingly.
2 | No.2 Revision |
The Calculator displays accurately numbers up to 100,000,000, anything above that is displayed in the exponential notation (e.g., 100,000,001 results in 1x10^8).
While further calculations are accurate, there is no option to expand the bigger number, and a copy to clipboard also copies the exponential notation.
I am not sure whether this is intended, a bug or perhaps there's a missing feature to allow the user to expand that number, so I'll let Jolla tag/comment accordingly.
3 | No.3 Revision |
The Calculator displays accurately numbers up to 100,000,000, anything above that is displayed in the exponential notation (e.g., 100,000,001 results in 1x10^8).
While further calculations are accurate, there is no option to expand the bigger number, and a copy to clipboard also copies the exponential notation.
I am not sure whether this is intended, a bug or perhaps there's a missing feature to allow the user to expand that number, so I'll let Jolla tag/comment accordingly.
4 | No.4 Revision |
The Calculator displays accurately numbers up to 100,000,000, anything above that is displayed in the exponential notation (e.g., 100,000,001 results in 1x10^8).
While further calculations are accurate, there is no option to expand the bigger number, and a copy to clipboard also copies the exponential notation.notation. The same can be observed in scientific mode.
I am not sure whether this is intended, a bug or perhaps there's a missing feature to allow the user to expand that number, so I'll let Jolla tag/comment accordingly.