We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
![]() | 1 | initial version | posted 2014-02-05 23:22:36 +0200 |
This has probably happened to most of you: when calling a contact with several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number automatically to first place.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
![]() | 2 | No.2 Revision |
This has probably happened to most of you: when calling a contact with several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number automatically to first place.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
![]() | 3 | No.3 Revision |
This has probably happened to most many of you: when calling a contact with that has several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number for that contact automatically to first place.place in his/her contact details.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
![]() | 4 | No.4 Revision |
This has probably happened to many of you: when calling a contact that has several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number for that contact automatically to first place in his/her contact details.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
EDIT: @vattuvarg commented: "An alternative would be to have the most frequently dialled number first." I agree that this would be even better, just thinking that maybe it is not so easy to implement. Edited title accordingly.
![]() | 5 | No.5 Revision |
This has probably happened to many of you: when calling a contact that has several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number for that contact automatically to first place in his/her contact details.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
EDIT: @vattuvarg commented: "An alternative would be to have the most frequently dialled number first." I agree that this would be even better, just thinking that maybe it is not so easy to implement. Edited title accordingly.
![]() | 6 | No.6 Revision |
This has probably happened to many of you: when calling a contact that has several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number for that contact automatically to first place in his/her contact details.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
EDIT: @vattuvarg commented: "An alternative would be to have the most frequently dialled number first." I agree that this would be even better, just thinking that maybe it is not so easy to implement. Edited title accordingly.
![]() | 7 | retagged |
This has probably happened to many of you: when calling a contact that has several numbers, the number offered is the first one for that contact, although e.g. you are calling this contact almost always to the second number and not the one offered.
It would be most convenient if the People app would move the last dialled number for that contact automatically to first place in his/her contact details.
There are two related questions: https://together.jolla.com/question/23885/sorting-phone-numbers-in-peoples-app/ (manually move up/down option) and https://together.jolla.com/question/3494/default-contact-number/ (assign a default number). I think that both of these ideas imply a lot of manual work (depending on how many contacts with several numbers you have).
EDIT: @vattuvarg commented: "An alternative would be to have the most frequently dialled number first." I agree that this would be even better, just thinking that maybe it is not so easy to implement. Edited title accordingly.