We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2014-02-07 11:06:38 +0200 |
Now that we have had few system updates that have had questions open here in Together whuch had been tagged with roadmap
befeore the upgrades to inform community that the issue/feutures are being worked on. Just before the upgrade jan14
appeared to some of those questions to indicate that an.implementation is scheduled to a specific system udate. Additionaly a text [Implemented in 1.0.3.8] has been added to rhose questions that have had the request implemented in the Jan/2014.
The suggestion here concerns the usage of roadmap tag which is still present in questions that have jan14-tag in them and 'implemented in 1.0;3.8' text in the title. Those questions have also beeen closed, so doesn't all this mean that they are resolved, implemented and are not anymore in the road-map?
Thus I suggest that roadmap
tag removed from all questions that have been conpletely resolved, i.e. questions that have 'jan14' tag in them and text '[Implemented in 1.0.3.8]' in the title. Also this practice should be continued in the future too. This way we maintain a clear view of what is going to happen knowing that the roadmap tag refers only to things ahead of us.
What do you.think?
2 | No.2 Revision |
Now that we have had few system updates that have had questions open here in Together whuch had Together. Many of those have been tagged with roadmap
befeore the upgrades to inform community that the issue/feutures are being worked on. Just before the upgrade jan14
appeared to some of those questions to indicate that an.implementation an mplementation is scheduled to a specific system udate. Additionaly a text [Implemented in 1.0.3.8] has been added to rhose questions those questions afterwards by moderators that have had the request implemented in the Jan/2014.Jan/2014 update.
The suggestion here concerns the usage of roadmap tag which is still present in questions that have jan14-tag in them and 'implemented in 1.0;3.8' text in the title. Those questions have also beeen closed, so doesn't all this mean that they are resolved, implemented and are not anymore in the road-map?
Thus I suggest that roadmap
tag removed from all questions that have been conpletely resolved, i.e. questions that have 'jan14' tag in them and text '[Implemented in 1.0.3.8]' in the title. Also this practice should be continued in the future too. This way we maintain a clear view of what is going to happen knowing that the roadmap tag refers only to things ahead of us.
What do you.think?
3 | No.3 Revision |
Now that we have had few system updates that have had questions open here in Together. Many of those have been tagged with roadmap
befeore the upgrades to inform community that the issue/feutures are being worked on. Just before the upgrade jan14
appeared to some of those questions to indicate that an mplementation is scheduled to a specific system udate. Additionaly a text [Implemented in 1.0.3.8] has been added to those questions afterwards by moderators that have had the request implemented in the Jan/2014 update.
The suggestion here concerns the usage of roadmap tag which is still present in questions that have jan14-tag in them and 'implemented in 1.0;3.8' text in the title. Those questions have also beeen closed, so doesn't all this mean that they are resolved, implemented and are not anymore in the road-map?
Thus I suggest that roadmap
tag removed from all questions that have been conpletely resolved, i.e. questions that have 'jan14' tag in them and text '[Implemented in 1.0.3.8]' in the title. Also this practice should be continued in the future too. This way we maintain a clear view of what is going to happen knowing that the roadmap tag refers only to things ahead of us.
What do you.think?