Revision history [back]
 | 1 | initial version | posted 2014-08-05 12:07:24 +0200  |
Licensing issues with sailfishsilica-qt5
- There are QML files which have no license header and thus are proprietary, is this intentional?
- There are non-QML files, aside from libsailfishsilicaplugin.so, what is their license? Could headers be added to them if possible OR their license be clarified somehow in the package?
- Well, any news about releasing sources for libsailfishsilicaplugin.so?
- Could Jolla consider hosting a source repository for the BSD licensed files
- For reference, see https://github.com/dm8tbr/sailfishsilica-qt5
| | 2 | No.2 Revision |
Licensing issues with sailfishsilica-qt5
- There are QML files which have no license header and thus are proprietary, is this intentional?
- There are non-QML files, aside from libsailfishsilicaplugin.so, what is their license? Could headers be added to
themthem, ifpossiblepossible, OR their license be clarified somehow in the package? - Well, any news about releasing sources for libsailfishsilicaplugin.so?
- Could Jolla consider hosting a source repository for the BSD licensed files
- For reference, see https://github.com/dm8tbr/sailfishsilica-qt5
| | 3 | retagged |
Licensing issues with sailfishsilica-qt5
- There are QML files which have no license header and thus are proprietary, is this intentional?
- There are non-QML files, aside from libsailfishsilicaplugin.so, what is their license? Could headers be added to them, if possible, OR their license be clarified somehow in the package?
- Well, any news about releasing sources for libsailfishsilicaplugin.so?
- Could Jolla consider hosting a source repository for the BSD licensed files
- For reference, see https://github.com/dm8tbr/sailfishsilica-qt5