We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2014-08-23 16:07:20 +0200 |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
2 | No.2 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT:
Detailing the main issues:
3 | No.3 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT:EDIT -----------
Detailing the main issues:
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT -----------
Detailing the main issues:
5 | No.5 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT -----------
EDIT:
Detailing the main issues:
EDIT 2:
I'm still seeing alot of duplicates, most of them easily avoidable with partial and related keyword matching!
Are there no plans to improve this situation?
6 | No.6 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT:
Detailing the main issues:
EDIT 2:
I'm still seeing alot of duplicates, most of them easily avoidable with partial and and/or related keyword matching!
Are there no plans to improve this situation?
7 | No.7 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some of my questions, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT:
Detailing the main issues:
EDIT 2:
I'm still seeing alot of duplicates, most of them easily avoidable with partial and/or related keyword matching!
Are there no plans to improve this situation?
8 | No.8 Revision |
Hi guys,
I've been noticing that some Alot of my questions, questions on tjc, are in fact duplicates, and alot of duplicates are found in tjc.I myself even being carefull searching first, sometimes have to close one question or another for being duplicate.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
So I ask you all:
1. Do you not agree?The main problems are:
2. shouldn't the search box be improved with a bit of extra smartness?
EDIT:
Detailing the main issues:
EDIT 2:
I'm still seeing I feel this is a bit troublesome, and we could do alot better. Having a better search algorithm could greatly increase the quality and focus of duplicates, most of them easily avoidable with partial and/or related keyword matching!
tjc! Are there no plans to improve this situation?
9 | No.9 Revision |
Hi guys,
Alot of questions on tjc, are in fact duplicates, I myself even being carefull careful searching first, sometimes have to close one question or another for being duplicate.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
The main problems are:
I feel this is a bit troublesome, and we could do alot better. Having a better search algorithm could greatly increase the quality and focus of tjc! Are there no plans to improve this situation?
10 | No.10 Revision |
Hi guys,
Alot of questions on tjc, are in fact duplicates, I myself even being careful searching first, sometimes have to close one question or another for being duplicate.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
The main problems are:
I feel this is a bit troublesome, and we could do alot better. Having a better search algorithm could greatly increase the quality and focus of tjc! Are there no plans to improve this situation?
EDIT: Tried Tag searching, as suggested by simo, and got partial keyword matching, but still no related keywords, and worst of all, it's out of focus, since most people will use the ask box, and won't even notice the tag search box.
At least half of the functonality is a low hanging fruit, so when are we going to improve the ask box?
11 | No.11 Revision |
Hi guys,
Alot of questions on tjc, are in fact duplicates, I myself even being careful searching first, sometimes have to close one question or another for being duplicate.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
The main problems are:
I feel this is a bit troublesome, and we could do alot better. Having a better search algorithm could greatly increase the quality and focus of tjc! Are there no plans to improve this situation?
EDIT:
Tried Tag searching, as suggested by simo, @simo, and got partial keyword matching, but still no related keywords, and worst of all, it's out of focus, since most people will use the ask box, and won't even notice the tag search box.
At least half of the functonality is a low hanging fruit, so when are we going to improve the ask box?
12 | No.12 Revision |
Hi guys,
Alot of questions on tjc, are in fact duplicates, I myself even being careful searching first, sometimes have to close one question or another for being duplicate.
I think the biggest culprit is the fact that the search box is not very smart!
The reason I say this is because I always look for my question's keywords before I ask a new question, but the search box rarely connects the dots.
The main problems are:
I feel this is a bit troublesome, and we could do alot better. Having a better search algorithm could greatly increase the quality and focus of tjc! Are there no plans to improve this situation?
EDIT: Tried Tag searching, as suggested by @simo, and got partial keyword matching, but still no related keywords, and worst of all, it's out of focus, since most people will use the ask box, and won't even notice the tag search box.
At least half of the functonality functionality is a low hanging fruit, so when are we going to improve the ask box?
EDIT 2: Just found a hilarious case, after seeing on the related column of some post, another one about mplayer/mpv playing which interested me, I closed that tab. But afterwards I went to look for that post with the search box and neither mplayer, nor mpv, had any matches, not even mplayer/mpv, the only way to find a match was to write mplayer/mpv-based!
Isn't this incredibly unhelpful? Is Jolla not going to move a muscle about fixing this incredibly inneficient tool, plaguing tjc?