Revision history [back]

The latest response which was somehow supposed to address the issues with exFAT being undesirable to some backers is confusing.

You created a poll about what [free] filesystems to support. I guess it means in addition to what is supported in Sailfish now already. But is that poll still about opinions on exFAT problem, or you are saying that you already decided to make exFAT mandatory and further input on that subject is pointless? Please clarify it to avoid mixing two unrelated issues (additional filesystems and keeping exFAT optional / on-demand).

The latest response which was somehow supposed to address the issues with exFAT being undesirable to some backers is confusing.

You created a poll about what [free] filesystems to support. I guess it means in addition to what is supported in Sailfish now already. But is that poll still about opinions on exFAT problem, or you are saying that you already decided to make exFAT mandatory in case the stretch goal is reached and further input on that subject is pointless? Please clarify it to avoid mixing two unrelated issues (additional filesystems and keeping exFAT optional / on-demand).

The latest response which was somehow supposed to address the issues with exFAT being undesirable to some backers is confusing.

You created a poll about what [free] filesystems to support. I guess it means in addition to what is supported in Sailfish now already. But is that poll still about opinions on exFAT problem, or you are saying that you already decided to make exFAT mandatory in case the stretch goal is reached and further input on that subject is pointless? Please clarify it to avoid mixing two unrelated issues (additional filesystems and keeping exFAT optional / on-demand).