We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
1 | initial version | posted 2015-06-08 21:58:42 +0200 |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reports2 | No.2 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reportsedit: Pushing this up for a while, as even more possible bug reports are sent as answers below announcement, instead of posting them as new question or updating earlier ones. What could we do?
3 | No.3 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reportsedit: Pushing this up for a while, as even more possible bug reports are sent as answers below announcement, instead of posting them as new question or updating earlier ones. Now not only by Early Adopters, but also after the public release. What could we do?
4 | No.4 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reportsedit: Pushing this up for a while, as even more possible bug since there are reports are sent as answers below announcement, instead of posting them as new question or updating earlier ones. Now not only by Early Adopters, but also after the public release. What could we do?flowing in without appropriate tagging
5 | retagged |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reportsedit: Pushing this up for a while, since there are reports flowing in without appropriate tagging
6 | No.6 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new reportsedit: Pushing this up for a while, since there are reports flowing in without appropriate tagging
7 | No.7 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
and bug
or possible-bug
in your new edit: Pushing this up for a while, since there are reports flowing in without appropriate tagging
8 | No.8 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
(for example 1.1.9.28
) in your new reports regarding unreleased (not yet public) softwareedit: Pushing this up for a while, since there are reports flowing in without appropriate tagging
9 | No.9 Revision |
First of all, thanks for all your past and upcoming reports on behalf of all the users. You're doing great job helping Jolla to polish the updates for public release.
Just a reminder to keep the playground clean, please don't take as an offence:
releasenumber
(for example 1.1.9.28
) in your new reports regarding unreleased (not yet public) softwareedit: Pushing this up for a while, since there are reports flowing in without appropriate tagging