[1.1.9.28] heavy battery drain even in stand by
after updating to. 1.1.9.28 I observe heavy battery drain even. In standby mode (zero app open). In nights it was 80% and in morning it goes down to 25-30%.
We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
after updating to. 1.1.9.28 I observe heavy battery drain even. In standby mode (zero app open). In nights it was 80% and in morning it goes down to 25-30%.
Reaching the lowest possible standby battery consumption requires that the device manages to enter late suspend and no peripherals stay erroneously powered on. Note that if the device does suspend, it does not matter if some ill behaved application would try to use cpu -> tracking just cpu usage is usually useless.
Failure to suspend makes power consumption jump approximately from 4mA to 13mA (or so and ignoring led, wlan and cellular activity), even if there is no cpu activity. As this also allows misbehaving apps to consume cpu resources, the impact could be higher too -> tracking cpu usage could reveal problems.
Check that autosuspend policy is not disabled - you should see:
mcetool | grep ^Autosu
Autosuspend policy: enabled
If it says "early" or "disabled", do:
mcetool --set-suspend-policy=enabled
Check if there are active wakelocks that would block system from entering late suspend:
cat /sys/power/wake_lock
How to identify processes that are potentially misusing cpu-keepalive:
journalctl -u mce | grep keepalive| grep 'long session'
Sep 20 22:16:52 Jolla mce[407]: modules/cpu-keepalive.c: cka_session_renew(): long session active after 180020 ms; id=34/undefined name=:1.197 pid=16244 cmd=/usr/libexec/packagekitd
Sep 20 22:22:03 Jolla mce[407]: modules/cpu-keepalive.c: cka_session_finish(): long session lasted 490707 ms; id=34/undefined name=:1.197 pid=16244 cmd=/usr/libexec/packagekitd
In the above example packagekitd was blocking suspend for fairly long time, but it is a) more or less expected b) it eventually finished -> If there is an unexpected process holding a long keepalive session without finishing it, there is a bug somewhere.
If none of the above reveals possible problems, it is something more exotic - like erroneously powered up peripheral device (the tohd bug left the nfc chip powered on causing IIRC ~30mA power drain).
Obvious answer: install Lighthouse and see who's using a lot of cpu.
I have 1.1.9.28 and battery consumption is perhaps even slightly better than what it was before update. With light usage easily 48 hours between charging.
Yes, it is but sometimes battery drains like hell even no app opened.
Pankaj Singh ( 2015-09-24 09:14:55 +0200 )editThis thread is public, all members of Together.Jolla.Com can read this page.
Asked: 2015-09-24 06:28:42 +0200
Seen: 683 times
Last updated: Sep 24 '15
UI is not responsive at low battery level <10% [released]
[Fixed in 1.0.3.8] Crash when linking contacts? [not relevant]
Time slider usage in video player of Gallery app causes the app to hang [duplicate]
QAudioOutput isn't integrated with system volume and libresource like QMediaPlayer
Bug: E-Mail synchronization does not work as configured [released]
Word prediction should be always turned off when entering passwords in Android apps [released]
Don't enforce focus to textfield [answered]
[Implemented in 1.0.3.8] Email: Honour Reply-To header [answered]
Absolutely agree. Just now, the battery went down overnight by 20% in less than 7 hours, with no apps open, no chat active... That never happened to me before - something is seriously wrong.
nodevel ( 2015-09-24 09:29:03 +0200 )editfor me it is somewhat the other way around. In standby the phone uses nearly no battery at all (2-3% over night), but when using the phone (reading through a forum in browser, not using anything else), I lost 30% within an hour..
dieerstegiraffe ( 2015-09-26 13:26:50 +0200 )edit@nodevel same here. after update to 2.0.0.10, battery level goes down above 5% per night even in flight mode.
fishegg ( 2015-10-26 13:47:12 +0200 )edit