Flatpak as a app distribution format?
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?
There is a community driven initiative to bring Flatpak to SFOS now: https://together.jolla.com/question/220308/flatpaks-on-sfos/.
Looks like the Librem 5 will be using Flatpak for distribution:
https://puri.sm/posts/music-player-lollypop-added-to-pureos-store-for-librem-5-phone-and-laptops/
There is flatpak support for Sailfish OS on github now.
Here's the tweet (via nitter link, lightweight and privacy respecting).
interesting comparison here .
Seems like its tied to Fedora and has more limitations than Appimage.
Can you point me to what you see on that page as making Flatpak somehow tied to Fedora ? I'm using Fedora myself and all my flatpacks come from Flathub, not some Fedora repo and use the generic runtimes (freedesktop/KDE/Gnome), not some Fedora specific runtime.
IIRC there have been plans to create a Fedora hosted service to build Flatpacks & a Fedora runtime, but I don't think that yet in place.
MartinK ( 2019-02-08 01:20:50 +0200 )editIt's not tied to Fedora at all. And note that this comparison is made by AppImage authors. From my experience AppImage is the most limited of the three and some points this comparison positions as advantages can be viewed as disadvantages as well (e.g. IMO the ability to run without installation and sandboxing is bad for Sailfish).
Aldrog ( 2019-02-08 16:01:14 +0200 )editThis thread is public, all members of Together.Jolla.Com can read this page.
Asked: 2016-06-08 12:48:46 +0200
Seen: 1,951 times
Last updated: Jan 10 '20
looks pretty good, there's no obvious showstoppers that I can see, but its perhaps still too early to tell whether its suitable for SFOS though
r0kk3rz ( 2016-06-08 13:22:46 +0200 )editFor an OS that tries to push privacy the sandboxing that flatpack offers makes sense.
ApB ( 2016-06-08 13:33:42 +0200 )editCan you tell us what flatpak is in short words?
alloj ( 2016-06-08 14:40:32 +0200 )editto be honest the name does not sound professional, so maybe not good idea to replace rpm.
alloj ( 2016-06-08 14:48:33 +0200 )edit@alloj that is just about the least professional comment I have heard for some time.
Now go back and do your homework!
juiceme ( 2016-06-08 14:55:09 +0200 )edit