We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
28

Flatpak as a app distribution format?

asked 2016-06-08 12:48:46 +0300

ApB gravatar image

updated 2020-01-10 15:59:53 +0300

jiit gravatar image

Does it make sense for SFOS to move to flatpack and replace the rpm format it currently uses?

https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/wiki

http://flatpak.org/

edit retag flag offensive close delete

Comments

3

looks pretty good, there's no obvious showstoppers that I can see, but its perhaps still too early to tell whether its suitable for SFOS though

r0kk3rz ( 2016-06-08 13:22:46 +0300 )edit
8

For an OS that tries to push privacy the sandboxing that flatpack offers makes sense.

ApB ( 2016-06-08 13:33:42 +0300 )edit

Can you tell us what flatpak is in short words?

alloj ( 2016-06-08 14:40:32 +0300 )edit
1

to be honest the name does not sound professional, so maybe not good idea to replace rpm.

alloj ( 2016-06-08 14:48:33 +0300 )edit
12

@alloj that is just about the least professional comment I have heard for some time.

Now go back and do your homework!

juiceme ( 2016-06-08 14:55:09 +0300 )edit

4 Answers

Sort by » oldest newest most voted
5

answered 2019-12-28 13:54:21 +0300

Alex gravatar image

There is a community driven initiative to bring Flatpak to SFOS now: https://together.jolla.com/question/220308/flatpaks-on-sfos/.

edit flag offensive delete publish link more
4

answered 2019-02-08 15:09:20 +0300

sunburnedpenguin gravatar image

Looks like the Librem 5 will be using Flatpak for distribution:

https://puri.sm/posts/music-player-lollypop-added-to-pureos-store-for-librem-5-phone-and-laptops/

edit flag offensive delete publish link more
4

answered 2020-01-10 15:03:35 +0300

Spark gravatar image

There is flatpak support for Sailfish OS on github now.

Here's the tweet (via nitter link, lightweight and privacy respecting).

edit flag offensive delete publish link more

Comments

Thanks to @rinigus and @coderus! Et werx!

Kopekenscheich ( 2020-04-07 20:43:27 +0300 )edit
1

answered 2019-02-07 22:06:43 +0300

cpb gravatar image

interesting comparison here .

Seems like its tied to Fedora and has more limitations than Appimage.

edit flag offensive delete publish link more

Comments

2

Can you point me to what you see on that page as making Flatpak somehow tied to Fedora ? I'm using Fedora myself and all my flatpacks come from Flathub, not some Fedora repo and use the generic runtimes (freedesktop/KDE/Gnome), not some Fedora specific runtime.

IIRC there have been plans to create a Fedora hosted service to build Flatpacks & a Fedora runtime, but I don't think that yet in place.

MartinK ( 2019-02-08 01:20:50 +0300 )edit

Nice link!

wosrediinanatour ( 2019-02-08 09:54:43 +0300 )edit
1

It's not tied to Fedora at all. And note that this comparison is made by AppImage authors. From my experience AppImage is the most limited of the three and some points this comparison positions as advantages can be viewed as disadvantages as well (e.g. IMO the ability to run without installation and sandboxing is bad for Sailfish).

Aldrog ( 2019-02-08 16:01:14 +0300 )edit
Login/Signup to Answer

Question tools

Follow
6 followers

Stats

Asked: 2016-06-08 12:48:46 +0300

Seen: 1,934 times

Last updated: Jan 10 '20