CardDAV 'full-sync' not only new contacts /+ DisplayName Problem .
Hey there,
i've a radicale server for webdav syncing - it works good.
My problem is, my jolla send only changes (new contacts) to the server,
but i want to send(sync) all my contacts from my phone to server.
(importing from server to jolly works)
Is there a workaround or fix for this ?
in past I've the same problem with owncloud sync
of curse i can fix the problem by using third programs, but i want to do it with my jolla
A nother Problem in my opinion is that the jolla dont set a display name (FN attribute -see below)
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
N:Jolla;Synctest;;;
X-GENDER:Unspecified
REV:2016-01-07T10:53:24Z
TEL:1234567890
UID:418fdba2429f4a65a3c093434989db51
X-RADICALE-NAME:418fdba2429f4a65a3c093434989db51.vcf
END:VCARD
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:3.0
PRODID:-//Inverse inc.//SOGo Connector 1.0//EN
UID:8f7f4f75-d716-451b-9358-45069be7ca6d
N:;Anskar
FN:Anskar
TEL;TYPE=cell:+4900000000
X-MOZILLA-HTML:FALSE
REV:2016-01-05T10:57:02+00:00
X-GENDER:Unspecified
X-RADICALE-NAME:d5b47925-1319-4f39-a529-9c14d2532d59.vcf
END:VCARD
I got a working sync to the cardDAV of my mail provider. But I'm also annoyed by the deleting of the FN attribute. The contact app seems not reading it and syncs the vcard back without it.
Tab ( 2016-02-01 23:27:28 +0200 )editAfter testing owncloud and carddav on Jolla, I figured out the same: only new contacts on the phone are copied to OC (8.2) server. I'd like to find a way to also save my old contacts to OC.
arno784 ( 2016-02-02 16:46:31 +0200 )editI hadn't seen this and reported a very similar issue (but with new contacts only): https://together.jolla.com/question/130461/contacts-generates-invalid-contacts/
WhyNotHugo ( 2016-02-26 04:32:38 +0200 )editCan you confirm that Sailfish explicitly deletes FN attributes for existing contacts? If so, it's a violation of the vCard spec (it's a mandatory attribute), that turns valid files into garbage (most other clients fail to parse them, or crash). The constant data loss (valid contacts -> invalid files) is way beyond acceptable and should be addressed with the highest priority.
WhyNotHugo ( 2016-02-26 04:35:36 +0200 )edit