Introducing new native Sailfish apps here at Together [duplicate]
To gain even better value for users and app developers in our community portal, it would be nice to get all the store apps introduced here under a same tag. I'm asking: If there is a nice way to make this happen, would you like to see the apps here (among all the other thing we do already)?
Edit: the above is essentially copied from.here: https://together.jolla.com/question/7979/identify-applications-with-unique-tag-on-store-release-to-support-eg-application-homepages-in-together/
and from this Answer (in regards of making Together a web-version of Store): https://together.jolla.com/question/2721/jolla-application-store-web-version/#post-id-3333
This would be good and these app could be also reviewed by users too. Developers would get the important feedback on their work and get new ideas for improvements on updates.
TimTTK ( 2014-01-20 00:10:41 +0200 )editThis is a duplicate of a proposal / comments in this question; https://together.jolla.com/question/7979/identify-applications-with-unique-tag-on-store-release-to-support-eg-application-homepages-in-together/
foss4ever ( 2014-01-20 10:26:15 +0200 )edit@jjaone the idea I first posted as an answer to your question was declared redundant by yourself. After I moved it under its own topic (because I also felt it was redundant), you now see it as a duplicate and close it? Please explain your behaviour a bit - IMO, our questions remain as related, not duplicate. However, I leave the decision to you to keep this closed or reopen it.
simo ( 2014-01-20 11:56:45 +0200 )editNo, your tagging system is different than proposed in original (and IMO much more complex, and would only duplicate the information in the single tag prefixes, thus 'redundant' in effect but needing two tags to do it). It was your decision to remove it from that question, not mine. Now this (new) question description is essentially duplicating the idea and suggestion of the question and answer linked in the description (the proposal of introdcuing store apps to Together appropriatly tagged). Of course, it would have been and still is much simpler to continue this discussion in the original question and not to fork another.
foss4ever ( 2014-01-20 12:12:42 +0200 )editOh, I see you've edited the title + the question there to include the introduction (updated 3 hour ago?) After that this really looks like a duplicate, unlike before, but it could also be seen that now your question duplicates this as well :D. Let's just forget it and work this out... I take it that after you're edit we are now very close to the same subject, so should I, in your opinion, move the original answer back there, and maybe @mgbler might move/edit his answer too? I wouldn't like to mix this soup any more.
simo ( 2014-01-20 12:33:08 +0200 )edit