answered
2014-02-09 05:44:09 +0200
I voted the question up. We all love our Jollas, and Jolla the company. However, let us not become blind to the truth: It is primarily an early adopter and nerd phone, and it is marketed on nerd values, none the least Free Open-Source Software (FOSS) values. Compared to the Android or iPhone flagships, it really has no place in the market. Even compared to the maximum bang-for-the-buck sweetspot midrange phones, the Jolla hardware lags behind. As we all know, the current state of the software is no where near as polished as what Apple and Google churn out. So what we have is a very promising enthusiasts phone, with lots of promise for the future, but it certainly isn't there for the mass markets yet.
Now I have seen my share of Apple fanbois, people that blindly accept and praise their favorite company, regardless of how that company acts, as long as the hardware looks beautiful. I really don't think Jolla can get away with the same for the audience they have! To believe in open source is a political state of mind, it is an ideal that has shown to be the most practical and powerful there is in the software industry (note how all still succesful mass-market OSs are based on open source). However, like all good political ideals, including democracy, it must be guarded and protected relentlessly!
No matter how much we love Jolla the company, we can not just accept when they behave wrongly, like the worst Apple fanbois do from Apple. We must hold Jolla to their image and style, make sure they remember that it isn't the company itself, or even the beauty of their products that makes us want to be a part of this development - it is the promise of a good phone that takes the FOSS ideals truly to heart that makes the Jolla phone better than anything else on the market.
It is very easy for a company to slip up; the marketers want some basic demographic data on their customers, and then you find yourself requiring that data instead of asking nicely for it as a voluntary request. It is us, the community, that has to keep the company true to its line. Not only because we love FOSS, but also because we love Jolla, and Jolla can not survive without those who believe in FOSS.
Please vote the question up! What Jolla is asking for is a small thing, easily circumvented by lying, but a protest now presents a clear line at an easy spot, before Jolla falls down a slippery slope to a place much harder to get out of.
tl;dr Jolla should ask us to volunteer the data, not require it
You ordered you Jolla online, right? There's your account. Or you can choose not to use it, and use SW from e.g. https://openrepos.net/
Tanghus ( 2014-02-08 22:54:51 +0200 )editThank you for the info and the link. I went there and couldn't find the SailFishOS System updates. Could you send me the link? Thanks again.
weareunlike ( 2014-02-08 23:21:45 +0200 )editLet me rephrase that: If you don't want to use your Jolla account - (which I believe you already have since you bought the phone online, but I might be wrong) - you can get community software updates from openrepos. Otherwise use your Jolla account to get system updates. Some of Jollas components are not free, and probably never will be. The firmware for mobile phones is ridden by patents and copyrights so it's not as "easy" as making just another Linux distro.
I really don't think there's a reason to feel your privacy threatened by having a Jolla account. Mine is just a username and a password.
Tanghus ( 2014-02-08 23:50:55 +0200 )editOh and btw, you already have a Jolla account since you are posting here ;)
Tanghus ( 2014-02-08 23:52:12 +0200 )editI beg to differ. Creating an account from my device to the Jolla service does bear the risk of a privacy threat. I needed to provide not only a user name and a password, but also a birthday and an email address. These are private details, which I need to provide if I want to comply with section 5 "Your right to use our Services" of the "terms of use" which states: "You are expressly prohibited from doing any of the following acts: ...Providing us false or misleading information....
weareunlike ( 2014-02-09 00:24:33 +0200 )edit