Jolla IM Server - XMPP for everyone
In the current IM flux with whatsapp and stuff, Jolla could make a loud snatch by having their own XMPP server with the latest state-of-the-art XEP/standards implemented and user prefixes from normal user accounts (eg chemist@jolla.com). Jabber and jingle server primarily for their customers but open to all.
Sure this would only make sense when the unified client eg telepathy-gabble would support all of it so sailors with their own accounts somewhere else or even their own server could profit too.
On a sidenote, all major players have their own email/messaging/cloud and so on, I know Jolla is yet to become a major player but starting it with doing things different could turn out to be the selling point. Supporting open solutions first and maybe later start up services for customers not so tech-savvy to host their own servers. Also integration of security services may come easy if you go down that road with XMPP+GPG/OTR. As long as you do not start negotiating with better solutions for you (reads outsourcing) like maybe Open Whispersystems I'd prefer going down the vanilla XMPP road and maybe contribute to issues like "push-messages".
Community input 2015-03-23 by @mosen
As facebook chat integration will be gone with facebooks recent strategic decisions, i am suggesting to set up a "Jolla XMPP Server" to close the gap a little.
To make it as convenient as possible to the casual user it would be nice if an account to that server would be automatically created and set up on the phone corresponding to the "Jollastore Username".
This clearly would be no substitute to easily message with "non-jolla" users but maybe a cool incentive to help swapping some of our contacts to inform themselfes about xmpp or even sail with us?
Instead of xmpp i would prefer a solution based on WebRTC if and when is possible.
ApB ( 2014-02-24 15:05:40 +0200 )edit@ApB if I wanted a browserOS I'd use chromium or firefox...
chemist ( 2014-02-24 15:25:00 +0200 )editI understand but its not about browsers (period) Its about a common, work everywhere standard. The end user just wants things to work. And having someone to be able to contact you from his browser mobile phone another app on the desktop or whatever is more convenient IMO.
ApB ( 2014-02-24 15:57:14 +0200 )editso webRTC is common? It used to be common about 15-20 years ago when everyone was hanging in chatrooms after that there was ICQ next to some other RTC programs evolving to what is now called IM. Now we have HTML5 and you want to start that process all over again with JavaScript negotiated P2P? Well it is a new technology based on what, right, XMPP! So what you are actually asking is that telepathy-gabble should also be able to negotiate WebRTC compliant P2P connections?! or for gecko?
chemist ( 2014-02-24 16:24:16 +0200 )editCommon not in the sense of widely accepted and used everywhere but as something that will -when its ready- work everywhere. Most browsers support it out of the box for example.
ApB ( 2014-02-24 16:49:02 +0200 )edit