Camera quality

asked 2014-07-15 19:28:45 +0300

gilgamesch13 gravatar image

updated 2014-07-31 13:55:13 +0300

jiit gravatar image

Hello sailers,

here is an example of Jolla-Sailfish high quality camera. The picture is made without any optical or other APP help. The photo is made per hand only. The condensators with #-101 are only 1,5 millimeters long.

N9 e.g. was not possible to make a sharp picture, even with the special APP Magnify.


Gottfried R. Weber

edit retag flag offensive close delete


Those "101" marked SMD components seem to be resistors (10*10^1 ohm = 100 ohm), but still the quality of the photo is pretty impressive :)

hzb ( 2014-07-15 20:02:23 +0300 )edit

I have to say that I have always been impressed with the camera quality. This is a great example.

bmwebb ( 2014-07-16 08:46:24 +0300 )edit

honestly, I would prefer to have a bit less blur due to over-excessive noise suppression algorithms, there might be some potential to fine tune the de-noise algorithm...

xenoide ( 2014-07-16 11:23:41 +0300 )edit

I've taken quite a number of reasonably good photos with my N9, while for the Jolla's camera quality unfortunately i find it at the very best only no better than the N9's. Where is the Jolla's camera sourced from ? Is it also from Zeiss or some less reputable make ? Whatever the case, i'm overall not too impressed with the Jolla camera as both my N9 & especially my 909 tend to produce far better photos & videos. But i understand in the case of Jolla, priority of the product is on the Sailfish software rather than the hardware which is also the main reason why i bought the Jolla for. In contrast my main (more less only) reason for getting the 909 was for the 1st class 41MP Zeiss lens !

Hseochin ( 2014-11-21 23:39:47 +0300 )edit