[survey] Would you buy another phone from Jolla? [not relevant]

+1 for the Euro-Patriotic thing

Who marked this answer as "correct"? Can there be a correct answer in a survey??

@Stefanix your right it couldn't be just one, according the feeling of all. i'm behind this yes here, behind yours and one below. and other are for a no which i would respect if the real fact are given. And the point of your correctly explain. All the no is for me until now without fact and explained point of view. Just frustrations... that sad... can't understand the reaction of some people.

Sorry i'm wrong. a good answer for me was from jolladiho https://together.jolla.com/question/127477/survey-would-you-buy-another-phone-from-jolla/?answer=127549#post-id-127549 If the someone has no money for it, they obviously he won't invest on it. first we should care of his own.

Yes, I would, too!

I really like the UI, and like you said, it's an European mobile OS. I don't want everything to be dominated by 2-3 big US companies.

Reactive? In what way? Aggressive non-speaking? Burn money immediately and faster then earning it? Answering complaints not at all or with groundless promisses???

@Moo-Crumpus "Aggressive non-speaking" what did you have expected? they have communicate that they were in difficulties, they have communicated why, and told at the time that they were back in business. And told that in their struggle that they have lost a lots of things, and all the promisses would not comes be realized (especially concerning the tablet). And have really explain that what they want to do. What do you need more? tell it please! i find that screaming overall that they make wrong make the the problem that you think (i don't know what is your problem, i dont read in mind) won’t make it better, is not helpfull non constructive. Sorry i don't want to look down on you, that is for me not understandable.

you tell burn the money, but before they lost their investor, then that was so much people who wanted this from jolla, then wanted that from jolla. And they did it pretty much things. And was not bad they had the security the investors was behind. Why should they not invest in some things when someone is behind? And we were behind too! for the tablet was so much investors, and people who told and claim "i am behind jolla"." I'm here and get the tablet." And now after the first storm all should be gone? They told that they investes with the money. What is now the problem?
Do someone calculate in what they should invests?
Do someone calculate how much cost 100 people?
According to this http://www.worldsalaries.org/finland.shtml If we admit that all would have the same salary, each people would earn 3,598€ without taxes (5th position), and not forget that the firm should pay something too for the person (pension,insurance), we are over 4000€.
We take 4000 x 100 = 400.000 IN ONE MONTH!!!! ohoh! what does it means for one year? 4.800.000. Just on peoples, and what is with business travel? materials, investment for hardware, tests, prototypes, advertisements. investor and customer acquirement?

I don't want to look down on you, but by as i understand what they told, they want and wish to make their best to satisfied the people, but could not satisfy all. they want means that they should work on something to reach it. That's not mean that they reach it 100%, and in this context should they not make promise based on speculation, because it will be a ly. Is just a matter of patience. They are reactive yes because they do their job, don't tell too much and too few. And in between we see that they are on working.
@Moo-Crumpus Did you that they are on the way for the next sfos release?

@Moo-Crumpus for further argument from my side i give you this one, an intersting discussion about salary and what should pay the firm in germany: http://www.gutefrage.net/frage/was-zahlt-der-arbeitgeber-zusaetzlich-zum-bruttogehalt

@Moo-Crumpus now that's your turn! please tell your problems with fact and what you think with arguments. Thx in advance

Fairphone 2?

its not a product from jolla.. so a no for that @Shmet

Presumably "licencing partner" implies that such a phone would have Android support, at least until there is a viable ecosystem of native SFOS apps. After TabletGate, a proven track record in delivering consumer hardware is important for SFOS too, I believe. With these qualifications, have an upvote :-)

:-) haha @jollailija this answer is not bad. the man in the middle. that is not NO, but not Yes too.

Yeah, even though I don't use Dalvik I think it's important for new users so they can be in their comfort zone while learning the ways of SFOS.
As Jolla doesn't design their own hw and it would likely be made in China, I don't care about the manufacturer. Also, keeping the current situation in mind this approach would get them more money with less hassle (shipping&warranty will be handled by hw maker not Jolla)

Yes ! me too, i never read this for a while! to be unlike!! you are unlike, i am unlike, they are unlike! :-)

I've come to believe the "#unlike" tag of Jolla means they don't like us... No listening to the community and keeping source closed.

through a stable partner Intex of fairphone yes

through Jolla in house hardware - no

I agree. I pre ordered the Jolla 1 without a doubt. I supported the Indiegogo project without so much as a thought.

But now, I'll be more cautious. I've already replaced the Jolla by a Lumia 950 xl for daily use (Jolla were still in surseance at the time and I was interested in Windows 10 Mobile), so I don't have room for another experimental OS.

I use an HTC for my work and 'must have' applications. Neither Sailfish, nor Windows is ready yet to take over this role completely. It's quite impressive how far Jolla has already gotten compared to a corporate giant, and I still like to think that Jolla can make it. But right now, I won't buy a Jolla phone just to support the company.