[regression] Two-way ActiveSync of contacts broken [answered]

asked 2014-12-24 22:30:58 +0200

saturn
1827 ●19 ●32 ●37

updated 2015-01-07 15:24:12 +0200

All new phone numbers added to an existing and previously synced contact are only stored locally.

[edit] additional info, as seen by the server:

Device OS: SailfishOS 1.0
Device language: English
User agent: SailfishOS/1.0-EAS-0.7.98
Access state: Access Granted
Access set by: Global Permissions
Policy applied: Default - Not applied
Policy updated: Not Available
ActiveSync version: 14.0

[edit2] * Microsoft Exchange server version 14.3.174.4001

[edit3]

It appears that the sync is working fine. The UI shows that the newly added information is local, but in reality it will be synced back to the server. (see also the attached image)

I'm not sure if this behavior is intentional or not, but for sure the initial claim of this report is wrong and i will close this issue.

image description

edit retag flag offensive reopen delete

The question has been closed for the following reason "the question is answered, an answer was accepted" by saturn
close date 2015-01-07 15:25:23.370379

Comments

saturn, with which provider you are syncing? Looks like someone else is having problems: https://together.jolla.com/question/73297/contacts-dont-sync-two-ways/

andreamtp ( 2014-12-24 23:11:46 +0200 )edit

@andreamtp it is with Microsoft Exchange server version 14.3.174.4001

saturn ( 2014-12-24 23:40:57 +0200 )edit

1

@jjaone - Asked the testing team and they cannot reproduce this problem, is your account in always-up to date or are you syncing the account from the pulley menu inside the account ? Note that a sync from email app only syncs emails.

VDVsx ( 2015-01-07 11:11:14 +0200 )edit

1

answered 2015-01-07 15:13:57 +0200

saturn
1827 ●19 ●32 ●37

@VDVsx I'm testing it again and now it is working. The UI's shows that the contact is local, but in reality it was synced back. I can only assume that last time i was testing it my network connection was simply messed up. I will update the description of the report.

edit flag offensive delete publish link

0

answered 2014-12-24 22:56:53 +0200

andreamtp
23 ●1 ●2 ●5

It's kind of weird thing. I previouly sync my carddav contacts with SyncEvolution to fruux. Now that there's the native support for carddav too, I switched to the native sync method.

What I can experience is that I had to remove fruux account from cell, wipe all the contacts on the phone, re-add the fruux carddav provider to be able to modify the numbers on carddav contacts. You recognize if the data are you seeing is local or remote going into modify contact, if the element has the phone icon is local, if it has the globe, is remote.

Birthdate is neither syncronized from fruux to jolla and from jolla to fruux.

Newly created contacts are not synced with fruux but are store only locally.

If the jolla idea is to work as overlay to the carddav providers, I'd prefer being allowed to choose where to save a newly created contact.

edit flag offensive delete publish link

0

answered 2014-12-24 22:57:11 +0200

squ
51 ●1 ●2 ●3

I cannot reproduce the problem here. I'm using Exchange ActiveSync 0.1.55 with Horde 5.2.3 as the server end.

edit flag offensive delete publish link

Comments

hey squ, i have problems get contact sync via Exchange and Horde running. Could you tell me, which settings you chosed?

prometoys ( 2015-08-02 13:19:40 +0200 )edit

[regression] Two-way ActiveSync of contacts broken [answered]

The question has been closed for the following reason "the question is answered, an answer was accepted" by saturn
close date 2015-01-07 15:25:23.370379

Comments

3 Answers

Comments

Question tools

Stats

Related questions

[regression] Two-way ActiveSync of contacts broken [answered]

The question has been closed for the following reason "the question is answered, an answer was accepted" by saturn close date 2015-01-07 15:25:23.370379

Comments

3 Answers

Comments

Question tools

Public thread

Stats

Related questions

The question has been closed for the following reason "the question is answered, an answer was accepted" by saturn
close date 2015-01-07 15:25:23.370379