[Request] Sourcecode for Silica core components
Hello Jolla,
it would be very nice if you could publish the sourcecode of the core Silica components. It would be a good start and would show a good faith to the developer community.
We have moved to a new Sailfish OS Forum. Please start new discussions there.
Hello Jolla,
it would be very nice if you could publish the sourcecode of the core Silica components. It would be a good start and would show a good faith to the developer community.
After consultation with Jolla, tbr imported all BSD licensed Silica source code into this Github repository:
https://github.com/dm8tbr/sailfishsilica-qt5
Very handy for reference! :)
This thread is public, all members of Together.Jolla.Com can read this page.
Asked: 2013-12-30 16:13:57 +0200
Seen: 1,084 times
Last updated: Oct 03 '14
Clarification of open-source policy [answered]
Jolla store: show app licenses and links to sources
[Request] Publish recent Kernel sources, perhaps even with git [answered]
Visible open source app community, supported by Jolla
Jolla-Maps / Here.com: Same provider, different data!? Outdated on Jolla..
Opt-in to "Release early, release often" Jolla upgrades [released]
source of Android Support (Alien Dalvik) [duplicate]
filter Jolla store for Open-Source [duplicate]
Most of the Silica QML is open sourced in the emulator environment, with BSD license, just no public repository for the QML components yet.
locusf ( 2013-12-30 16:26:35 +0200 )editI think that you need to read https://together.jolla.com/question/680/co-creation-leading-to-co-development/ and the following answers. In short, open-sourcing also implies handling patches from community, open process etc and takes some time to settle.
Sfiet_Konstantin ( 2013-12-30 16:31:05 +0200 )editIn an ideal world this is how opensource would be working, but if you look at google for example opensource can also be quite unidirectional. Of course this isn't a good way but it would most certainly be a good start and definitely strengthen the trust in the sailfish operating system.
djselbeck ( 2013-12-30 16:36:54 +0200 )editI do not see why trust comes up so often. Why would I need a source code? Is something wrong with Silica? If yes, then tell it to the people who works on it. Not everything needs a change. Just my 2 cents.
Macilaci457 ( 2013-12-30 18:20:16 +0200 )editMaybe you don't care but there are people who do. I can say for me that I hate to develop for an platform which depends on some company alone. It just demotivates me to work for it. If it is open and can exists without a company I'm just more pleased. There is nothing wrong with Silica.
djselbeck ( 2013-12-30 18:25:19 +0200 )edit